Role of Intergroup Contact as Relational Initiative to Alleviate Prejudice among Faith Based Groups

  • Tauqeer Ahmed Lak University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan
  • Prof. Dr. Ghulam Yasin University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan
  • Mussarat Hussain University of Sargodha, Bhakkar Campus, Pakistan
Keywords: Prejudice, Intergroup sects, Intergroup conflict, Beliefs, Attitudes

Abstract

Prejudice is defined as negative attitudes, feelings, or intentions toward other people based on the belief that they belong to different social groups. Prejudice influences young people's social experiences and contributes to intergroup conflicts and patterns of social exclusion throughout their lives. In this regard, the current study was conducted to see the effectiveness of intergroup contact in mitigating prejudice among university students and to examine the efficacy of intergroup contact in mitigating prejudice between outer-sect university students. Because of this, this study used a quantitative research design and survey research methods. The data was collected from students attending the three most prominent universities in the province of Punjab, which are situated in the province's south, north, and center, respectively. A questionnaire was used as a tool for data collection. Preexisting scales regarding variables were adapted and used in the study. The amended scale was provided to the students through email and the instant messaging application WhatsApp. The information was gathered from 218 respondents using a convenience sampling technique. Regression and correlation analyses were used in order to analyze respondents' inferential responses. The study results showed that there is a substantial and positive correlation between contact with outside sects and reduced prejudice towards those sects. Moreover, contact with out-group sects showed a positive and significant effect on attitudes toward prejudice reduction among university students. In the Pakistani context, there are many studies regarding prejudice, but research gaps exist. This study is trying to uncover the research gap of preexisting studies regarding prejudice. Our study focused on prejudice among faith-based groups; the area that was uncovered in this study is the role of Intergroup Contact as a Relational Initiative to Alleviate Prejudice among Faith-Based Groups.

References

Aboud, F. E., Tredoux, C., Tropp, L. R., Brown, C. S., Niens, U., & Noor, N. M. (2012). Interventions to reduce prejudice and enhance inclusion and respect for ethnic differences in early childhood: A systematic review. Developmental Review, 32(4), 307-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2012.05.001

Bagci, S. C., & Blazhenkova, O. (2020). Unjudge someone: Human library as a tool to reduce prejudice toward stigmatized group members. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 42(6), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1792298

Bhalerao, S. (2016). Role of emotional intelligence in organizational conflict Management. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 2(2), 37-43.

Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Saguy, T., & Halabi, S. (2008). From when to why: Understanding how contact reduces bias. Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444303117.ch6

Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview. The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919.n1

Dunham, Y. (2017). Implicit intergroup bias and the long road to predicting discrimination. The Wiley handbook of group processes in children and adolescents. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118773123.ch10

Gabrielli, S., Catalano, M. G., Maricchiolo, F., Paolini, D., & Perucchini, P. (2022). Reducing implicit prejudice towards migrants in fifth grade pupils: Efficacy of a multi-faceted school-based program. Social Psychology of Education, 25, 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09688-5

Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(4), 708-724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708

Killen, M., Elenbaas, L., & Rutland, A. (2015). Balancing the fair treatment of others while preserving group identity and autonomy. Human Development, 58(4-5), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444151

Levy, S. R., Shin, J. E., Lytle, A., & Rosenthal, L. (2017). Systemic approaches to reduce prejudice in schools. In Handbook of multicultural school psychology. Oxfordshire, England: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203754948-13

Mai, L. T., & Thuy, B. L. (2015). Work-family role conflict: A survey of woman entrepreneurs in hochiminh city. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1(1), 36-47.

Mallett, R. K., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008). Expect the unexpected: failure to anticipate similarities leads to an intergroup forecasting error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.94.2.265

Malik, M. S, & Sagheer, H. (2022). Impact of personal biases and organizational politics on performance appraisal systems- A case study of the service sector of Pakistan. Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(6), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.33152/jmphss-6.6.2

Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., & Killen, M. (2023). When fairness and group loyalty conflict: Social exclusion, prejudice, and bias in adolescence and early adulthood. In L. J. Crockett, G. Carlo, & J. E. Schulenberg (Eds.), APA handbook of adolescent and young adult development. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000298-010

Pettigrew, T. F. (2006). A two-level approach to anti-immigrant prejudice and discrimination. Cultural Psychology of Immigrants, 95-112.

Sidanius, J., Van Laar, C., Levin, S., & Sinclair, S. (2004). Ethnic enclaves and the dynamics of social identity on the college campus: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.96

Stephan, W. G., & Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55(4), 729-743. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00144

Tropp, L. R. (2012). Understanding and responding to intergroup conflict: Toward an integrated analysis. In Linda R. Tropp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Intergroup Conflict. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747672.013.0001

Whitley Jr, B. E., & Webster, G. D. (2019). The relationships of intergroup ideologies to ethnic prejudice: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(3), 207-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318761423

Woodgate, R. L., Gonzalez, M., Demczuk, L., Snow, W. M., Barriage, S., & Kirk, S. (2020). How do peers promote social inclusion of children with disabilities? A mixed-methods systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(18), 2553-2579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1561955

Published
2022-11-25
How to Cite
Tauqeer Ahmed Lak, Prof. Dr. Ghulam Yasin, & Mussarat Hussain. (2022). Role of Intergroup Contact as Relational Initiative to Alleviate Prejudice among Faith Based Groups. Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(6), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.33152/jmphss-6.6.3
Section
Articles