EDITORIAL POLICIES

 

Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences (JMPHSS) is a prominent peer-reviewed, open-access journal available online. The primary aim of JMPHSS is to disseminate scientific knowledge and foster interdisciplinary discourse, bridging various fields within the social sciences. The publication adheres to ethical standards outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), ensuring integrity across all facets of the publishing process.

Ethical guidelines govern the conduct of all stakeholders involved in publishing with JMPHSS, including authors, editors, peer reviewers, and the broader scholarly community. Published articles undergo rigorous peer review, serving as pillars of the scientific method and reflecting the caliber of authors' work and institutional support. Society for Arts and Social Sciences (SASS), as the publisher of JMPHSS, upholds its responsibilities diligently, ensuring that editorial decisions remain independent of commercial influences such as advertising or reprint revenue.

Editors hold the following responsibilities:

  • All the steps involved in evaluation should be strictly adhered to so that the eminence of the research can be maintained. Any decision concerning the acceptance, rejection, major and minor revision of any paper should be made on the basis of the standard quality guidelines of the respective journal.
  • When any paper is being submitted, author should guarantee the authorities that the paper has not been submitted for getting published in any other journal. On the same lines, Editor is also not allowed to submit the work under review with any other person or institution except with the consent of the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers and the publisher.
  • The sole criterion of evaluation should be the eminence of research used in the paper and should not be biased in any sense.

Reviewers need to fulfill the following duties:

  • The effective blinded peer review process facilitates the editors to improve the paper quality and take accurate decisions regarding every submission
  • It is important that all the submissions considered for peer review should be taken as the secret essays and editor needs to keep them confidential throughout the process.
  • If the concerned reviewer is not able to review the manuscript within the given deadline, it should be brought to the editor’s knowledge. Even if the reviewer does not have the skills and expertise for manuscript review, it should be duly informed to the editor.
  • The reviewer should check for the fact that the works cited in the paper are actually backed by the corresponding research works. It is the duty of the reviewer to make sure that the materials given in the article are backed by authentic citations and should make out any work not considered by the author. If reviewer doubts the submitted manuscript to be plagiarized, then he/she must apprise the editor of this information.
  • Author should not be targeted with personal critique. Referees should support the author’s efforts through their comments.

Authors should be aware of the following facts:

  • The manuscripts that are found to be plagiarized above the minimum tolerable level will be rejected before entering into the review phase. The concerned personnel should reconfirm the manuscript’s originality by meticulously checking the document for any trace of plagiarism.
  • Author should guarantee that the submitted manuscript is not being considered for publication in any other journal. It will be considered against ethics if any manuscript is found to be under review with more than one journal.
  • Authors should explicitly mention the reactions of the chemicals, procedures or equipment utilized in the research if any.
  • Only the real contributor of the paper can claim to be the owner of the manuscript submitted. Authors’ names should be stated according to their contributions in the paper. Author should only add the names of those people who were actually involved in bringing together of the corresponding manuscript.
 

Peer Review Process and Time

Peer Review

The Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences follows a rigorous Double-Blind Review procedure, ensuring fairness, efficiency, and excellence in article quality. This process maintains anonymity for both authors and reviewers, reducing potential biases arising from factors like nationality or previous controversial work. By protecting author anonymity, the review process emphasizes the assessment of manuscript content rather than the reputations of well-known authors. Author anonymity to prevent reviewer bias, for example, based on the author's country of origin or previous controversial work. Manuscripts written by prestigious or well-known authors are considered based on the content of their manuscripts, not their reputation. This statement is based on the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) Code of Conduct and Best Practice Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.

The Peer Review Process (Source: More Types of Reviews)

Article Review Process

Upon submission, articles undergo several sequential stages before publication:

Initial Review Stage (7 to 10 days): Submitted articles are assessed by the journal's editor to ensure compliance with the "Guide for Authors" format and alignment with the journal's objectives and scope. Articles meeting these criteria proceed to the next stage, where a peer reviewer is assigned.

Review Stage (6-8 weeks): Articles passing the initial review are sent to two or more expert reviewers.

Articles accepted with minor or major revisions must be revised in accordance with the reviewers’ comments and suggestions. Subsequently, reviewers will provide their reports to the editor, recommending one of the following actions:

  • Accept Submission
  • Revisions Required
  • Decline Submission

Editors will base their decisions on these recommendations and reviewer comments, with the possibility of seeking additional review if necessary (Second Round). The Editor in Chief will ultimately determine the acceptance, revision, or rejection of the manuscript.

Article Resubmission (After Peer Review)

Almost every published paper undergoes at least one round of revision. Authors should view a revision request as positive feedback and an opportunity to enhance the quality of their research paper. It is crucial to revise the paper meticulously according to the reviewers’ suggestions to avoid unnecessary delays in the review process. The revised paper, along with a detailed response to the review report, should be submitted within 6-8 weeks.

Authors must ensure accuracy and thoroughness in incorporating the reviewers’ suggestions to avoid further review cycles and potential delays. If the editors determine that the reviewers’ comments have not been satisfactorily addressed, additional revisions may be required.

Considering other academic and professional commitments, authors may request additional time if they believe that more effort and time are needed to improve the paper’s quality.

After addressing reviewer comments or justifying lack of revisions, articles enter the publication queue. Authors receive formal notification of final acceptance.

Accepted manuscripts will be published in consideration of the sequence of acceptance dates, authors' geographical distribution, and the order of acceptance. The publication process typically takes 6-7 months from submission.

Source: Elsevier

 

 Publication Frequency

JMPHSS is a bi-monthly journal.

 

Abstracting and Indexing

JMPHSS is indexed by following

  • HEC "Y" Category
  • ULRICHWEB PERIODICAL DIRECTORY
  • Cabells Journalytics (USA)
  • PUBLONS
  • GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  • CROSSREF
  • DIMENSIONS
  • SSRN
  • ACADEMIA
  • MENDELEY
  • SCILIT
  • ERIH PLUS
  • RePEc
  • HJRS HEC Pakistan
  • OCLC
  • WorldCat
  • CiteFactor
  • EuroPub
 

Open Access Policy

Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences (JMPHSS) provides immediate open access to its content, operating under the premise that freely available work promotes a wider global exchange of ideas. All peer-reviewed research articles published in this journal are universally available over the internet without any restrictions on usage frequency. Articles are presented in a user-friendly format immediately upon publication.

This statement is based on the OASPA, Budapest Open Access Initiative, and Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing.

 

Misconduct/Retraction Policy

JMPHSS takes seriously all allegations of potential misconduct. If there is a suspicion of misconduct, If, after investigation, the allegation seems to raise valid concerns, the accused author will be contacted and given an opportunity to address the issue. If misconduct has been established beyond reasonable doubt, this may result in the Editor-in-Chief’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to:

  • If the article is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author.
  • If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction, either an erratum will be placed with the article or in severe cases retraction of the article will occur. The reason must be given in the published erratum or retraction note. Please note that retraction means that the paper is maintained on the platform, watermarked “retracted” and explanation for the retraction is provided in a note linked to the watermarked article.
  • The paper's HTML version gets eliminated.
  • The author’s institution may be informed

Retraction: On rare occasions, when the scientific information in an article is substantially undermined, it may be necessary for published articles to be retracted. JMPHSS will follow the COPE guidelines and Elsevier policy regarding article retraction in such cases.

Retracted articles are indexed and linked to the original article.

 

Conflicts of Interest Statement

Transparency in research is crucial.

  1. The potential and relevant competing financial, personal, social, or other interests of all authors that might be influenced by the publication of the manuscript's results must be disclosed and communicated to the editor.
  2. Authors should reveal any potential conflicts of interest as early as possible, including but not limited to employment, consultancies, honoraria, patent applications or registrations, grants, or other funding.
  3. Additionally, all sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed, along with a brief description of the role, if any, played by the sponsors during various stages of the research.

For detailed guidelines, refer to Elsevier “Declaration of Interest” policy.

Statement on Informed Consent

For research work dealing with human subjects, participants (or their parent or guardian in the case of children under 18) should be asked for their informed consent before their involvement in the study and this should be highlighted in the research work too. For more information, please review the Elsevier Policy on the Use of Images or Personal Information of Patients or other Individuals.

 

Screening for Plagiarism

As a reputable international journal, Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences (JMPHSS) is committed to ensuring that all authors adhere to rigorous academic integrity standards, with a particular emphasis on combating plagiarism. In accordance with the guidelines of the Higher Education Commission (HEC), the Journal of Management Practices, Humanities, and Social Sciences (JMPHSS) adheres to a Zero Tolerance policy towards plagiarism. JMPHSS vehemently opposes and discourages any form of plagiarism.

(http://www.hec.gov.pk/english/services/faculty/Documents/Plagiarism/Plagiarism%20Policy.pdf)

All submissions to JMPHSS will undergo plagiarism screening, and manuscripts found to contain plagiarized content will be rejected. JMPHSS uses Turnitin, and our own software to detect submissions that overlap with published and submitted manuscripts. Papers submitted to JMPHSS must maintain a similarity level of less than 20%. Manuscripts that are found to have been plagiarized from a manuscript by other authors, whether published or unpublished, will be rejected and the authors may incur sanctions. Any published articles may need to be corrected or retracted.

Editors and reviewers will assess instances of minor plagiarism, such as the reuse of parts of an introduction from a previous paper or self-plagiarism, which involves recycling significant or nearly identical sections of one's own work without acknowledgment. In the event of post-publication discovery of plagiarism, retraction will be initiated, and a statement will be published in the subsequent issue.

(http://www.hec.gov.pk/english/services/faculty/Plagiarism/Pages/default.aspx)

Plagiarism encompasses presenting another person’s ideas or words as your own without proper permission, credit, or acknowledgment, or failing to cite sources correctly. It can range from direct copying to rephrasing another's work. We emphasize that plagiarism is a serious academic offense, even if unintentional, and is unacceptable in international academic publications. Proper citation is essential when using specific information from a source.

Identifying potential plagiarism involves several scenarios:

  1. Literal copying occurs when an author reproduces another's work word for word without permission or acknowledgment. This can be detected by comparing the original source with the suspected manuscript.
  2. Substantial copying involves reproducing a significant portion of another's work without permission or acknowledgment. Both the quality and quantity of the copied text are considered, with quality referring to its value in relation to the overall work.
  3. Paraphrasing occurs when an author takes ideas, words, or phrases from a source and presents them as their own without proper citation. This form of plagiarism can be challenging to detect.

At JMPHSS, we uphold academic integrity rigorously. The editorial team reserves the right to withdraw acceptance from any paper found to violate these standards. Additionally, we may remove or restrict access to files containing unlawful content or content that violates JMPHSS policies or the rights of third parties.

For more information, potential authors are encouraged to contact the editorial office at info@global-jws.com.

 

Archiving Policy

Notice that the generic copyright arrangement for the publication permits the self-archiving, under some terms, of various copies of the document. The specifics of various versions are given here;

Green Open Access: Archiving and Sharing Policy

You can always in any format share the original submission or accepted manuscript. You can publish a downloaded copy in any website, save a copy in a repository or network, share a copy via any social media forum, and distribute print or electronic copies in an original submission or an accepted manuscript.

The final published PDF (or original submission or accepted manuscript, if you choose) can be used as follows:

  • In connection with your own teaching, provided that any electronic dissemination keeps restricted access
  • Share with research collaborators on an individual basis provided the sharing is not for commercial purposes.
  • In the course of your research or dissertation including where a thesis is placed in some institutional electronic repository or archive
  • In the book that you have written or edited some time since the printing of the paper.

Provided that:

  • No fee shall be charge for access to the original submission and approved manuscript.
  • All reuse terms for website and repository users (where the original submission or accepted manuscript is posted) is for non-commercial purposes and are not derived.
  • The Final Published PDF cannot be posted without JMPHSS authorization on any unrestricted Web site or archive.
  • Every edition of your contribution can not be republished and translated into another journal without JMPHSS' prior permission.
  • The Journal is properly credited as the initial edition, with the full quotation material included any time the Contribution is further circulated or reused or quotations are reused.
  • Please make a note that your contribution is approved for journal publishing, after your contribution is approved for publication and before a DOI can be assigned.
  • Please include this in your postal contribution in a format equivalent to the following until complete quotation information for your Contribution is available.
     
 
 

Article Processing Charges

JMPHSS is a peer-reviewed journal with open access. Each peer-reviewed article is made freely available online immediately after publication and is published under a Creative Commons license. The journal's publication costs are covered by the collection of article processing charges, which are paid by the funder, institution, or author of each accepted manuscript. There are no fees associated with submitting a paper to the journal.

APC will only be paid after acceptance and have no guarantee or influence on the blind peer review process.

If, after peer review, your manuscript is accepted for publication by reviewers’ satisfaction and editor’s notification, then only a one-time Article Publication Charge (APC) is payable. This APC covers the cost of publication and ensures that your article will be freely available online in perpetuity under a Creative Commons license.

An Article Publication Charge (APC) of $100 USD (plus tax where applicable) will be payable on acceptance if the manuscript is accepted after peer review.

 

Sources of Revenue

All costs associated with publishing an Open Access article in the Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences (JMPHSS) are covered by APC. JMPHSS is published under a Creative Commons 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA), 

 

Authorship

Listing the names of the contributors on a paper is an effective method for acknowledging those who contributed greatly. It also guarantees that those accountable for the authenticity of content are made transparent.

All the following conditions shall be met by the authors mentioned in an article:

  • Make an important contribution to reporting, whether in designing, designing, executing, acquiring, analyzing and interpreting data, or in any of these fields.
  • The draft was written or amended extensively or objectively.
  • Settled on a paper that would be submitted to the journal.
  • Reviewed and agreed on all versions of the article before submission, during revision, the final version accepted for publication, and any significant changes introduced at the proofing stage.
  • Agree to take and bear responsibility for the contents of the article and to answer any concern raised about accuracy or integrity of the published work.

Above statements are based on/adapted from:

Affiliation

The primary affiliation for each author should be the institution where the majority of their work was conducted. If an author has since relocated, the current address may also be provided. Addresses will not be updated or changed after the article has been published.

Changes to Authorship

Authors are strongly encouraged to ensure the accuracy of the author group, the Corresponding Author, and the order of authors at the time of submission. Changes to authorship, including adding or deleting authors or altering the order of authors, will not be accepted after manuscript acceptance.
Please note that author names will be published exactly as they appear on the accepted submission.
Ensure that all author names are included and spelled correctly, and that addresses and affiliations are up-to-date.
Adding or deleting authors during the revision stage is generally not allowed, though exceptions may be made in certain cases. Any changes must be justified, and approval is at the discretion of the Editor-in-Chief. Individual journals may have specific policies regarding changes to authorship during revision.

Author Identification

Authors are encouraged to use their ORCID ID when submitting an article or to obtain an ORCID ID through the submission process.

Data Transparency

All authors must ensure that all data, materials, and software applications or custom code supporting their published claims are available and comply with field standards. Note that journals may have specific policies on sharing research data in line with disciplinary norms and expectations.

Role of the Corresponding Author

One author is designated as the Corresponding Author and acts on behalf of all co-authors to ensure that any questions related to the accuracy or integrity of the work are appropriately addressed. The Corresponding Author's responsibilities include:

  • Ensuring all listed authors have approved the manuscript prior to submission, including the order of authors;
  • Handling all communication between the journal and co-authors before and after publication;
  • Providing transparency on the reuse of material and mentioning any unpublished material (e.g., manuscripts in press) in a cover letter to the Editor;
  • Ensuring disclosures, declarations, and transparency on data statements from all authors are included in the manuscript, as appropriate.

Author Contributions

In the absence of specific instructions and in fields where it is possible to describe individual contributions, the Publisher recommends including contribution statements that specify each author's role to promote transparency. These contributions should be listed on a separate title page.

Authorship Issues or Disputes

In the event of an authorship dispute during peer review or after publication, the Journal will not investigate or adjudicate. Authors must resolve the dispute among themselves. If they cannot, the Journal reserves the right to withdraw the manuscript from the editorial process or, in the case of a published paper, raise the issue with the authors’ institutions and follow their guidelines. JMPHSS follow COPE guidelines to resolve authorship issues.

Confidentiality

Authors must treat all communication with the Journal as confidential. This includes correspondence with journal representatives such as Editors-in-Chief, Handling Editors, and reviewers, unless explicit consent has been received to share the information.

 

Manuscript Submission

Submission Requirements

Before submitting a manuscript to JMPHSS, authors are required to ensure and confirm the following:

  • The manuscript has not been previously published, is not under review elsewhere, and will not be submitted elsewhere during the review period at JMPHSS. Manuscripts presented and published in academic conference proceedings or workshops are eligible for consideration.
  • Opinions, information, and figures presented in articles are the sole responsibility of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Journal of Management Practices, Humanities, and Social Sciences. The author, not JMPHSS, is accountable for any clinical guidance or statements published.
  • Lead authors are responsible for obtaining necessary permissions to publish from their organization/employer and/or funders.
  • Manuscripts must undergo plagiarism checks, both in whole and in part.
  • Correspondence regarding the manuscript will be conducted with the responsible author, and any communications from other sources will be disregarded.
  • Authors, referees, and senior users involved in the publication process must declare any conflicts of interest (conflict of interest form).
  • Manuscripts should not have been previously submitted to JMPHSS for review.
  • Any working papers or prior drafts posted on websites or databases will be removed during the review process.
  • Plagiarism screening will be conducted for all submissions, and manuscripts containing plagiarism will be rejected. For more details, refer to [Insert reference here].
  • The use of Artificial Intelligence tools, such as chatbots, to generate any part of the submission is prohibited as it constitutes plagiarism. Submissions will be scanned for the use of AI. However, authors may use automated tools to enhance the readability of their own written text.

Criteria for Publication

To be published in JMPHSS, a manuscript must make strong theoretical and empirical contributions to the field of engineering and technology. Authors interested in publishing with JMPHSS should strive to produce original, interesting, valuable, insightful, and important research. The acceptance of article for publication in JMPHSS highly depends upon the originality, value, importance, and significance of your research. Submissions that do not offer strong theoretical or empirical contribution will not be reviewed.

Each submitted manuscript would be assigned to action editor for evaluation. The action editor will decide whether to forward the manuscript to the reviewers. Typically, papers should be no longer than 10000 no of words (using one-inch margins, left aligned, and Times New Roman 12-point font) including references, tables, figures, and appendixes.

Author Instructions

  • The manuscript should be composed using Word software and submitted in Word Docx (2016) format. Submission is exclusively via the journal's website; articles sent through other means, such as email or manual submission, will not be accepted.
  • Manuscripts under review and for publication in this journal must not have been previously published in other domestic or foreign journals, nor concurrently submitted to other domestic or foreign journals for review.
  • Manuscripts should adhere to the journal's formatting guidelines. For specific formatting requirements for different types of articles, please refer to the corresponding section on the types of articles page.

The general structure of articles should follow the outlined format:

Formatting: Ensure the manuscript is in Microsoft Word .doc or .docx format, Times New Roman font, size 11 for the main text, and devoid of unnecessary formatting. Avoid numbering pages, using Endnotes, inserting Headers or Footers, or placing text in boxes. The editorial team will format your article according to JMPHSS's style.

Title: Keep it concise yet captivating, including keywords for database searches. JMPHSS may assign a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) to your article prior to publication.

Authors: Provide names (given and family) of all authors without titles/qualifications or degrees; include affiliations (e.g., institution/location) for each author and an email address for corresponding correspondence. All named authors must consent to publication, verified before publication.

Abstract: For full-length articles, craft a brief abstract within 300 words. Utilize headings: Introduction, Objective, Method, Results, Conclusion. Abstracts are frequently indexed by search engines.

Keywords: Offer up to 5 keywords to elucidate content for online searches. Keywords should ideally be single words, although specialist terms or acronyms spanning two or three words are acceptable. Ensure each keyword appears in both the abstract and main text.

Abbreviations/Acronyms: Employ sparingly. Introduce them after the full term's first usage in the abstract and main article (e.g., World Health Organization (WHO)), then utilize only the acronym thereafter.

Main Article: Typically comprises Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, Conclusion.

Tables: Each table requires a number and title, referenced in the text. Avoid shading and maintain simple formatting. Use 'n' instead of 'N', '% instead of 'percentage', and present 'n' and '%' in the same column (e.g., 'n (%)'). Employ p-value, not P-value. Refer to Table Presentation Guidelines for assistance. If the table has been previously published elsewhere, obtain copyright holder consent for republication.

Images/Charts: Limit images to photographs, graphs, and other visuals. Submit these as separate .jpg files (not Word or ppt), preferably high resolution. Each image should be numbered with a caption specifying credit or copyright. If not the author's property, obtain written/email permission from the copyright holder. Permission from identifiable individuals, preferably in writing/email, is required for publication.

Hyperlinks/Websites: Ensure functionality.

Include as needed: Declarations of conflict of interest from all authors; funding sources; permission from organization/employer and/or funder; ethical approval for clinical research involving human subjects (provide documentation); authors' roles in the study; acknowledgements.

Article Text

Organize the content under the following headings:

Introduction Outline the problem statement, theoretical foundations, research background, goals, questions, or hypotheses.
Theoretical Foundations and Research Background Define concepts and present relevant internal and external research findings supporting hypotheses and conceptual models.
Methodology Provide details of the research plan, data collection tools and methods, sample demographics, model, variables, and calculations.
Data Analysis Report demographic characteristics of the sample and results of statistical analysis of the model and research hypotheses.
Discussion and Conclusion Present main findings, compare with related research, offer practical suggestions, future research directions, and limitations.
Conflict of Interest Declare any potential conflicts under the heading of “Conflict of the Interest” before acknowledgments.
Acknowledgments Acknowledge individuals who contributed to the study but are not listed as authors, as well as organizations sponsoring or funding the research.
References Arrange references at the end of the article without numbering. Include all references cited in the article, providing full details in the specified format. Use Times New Roman font size 12 for references.

Reference Style

The in-text citation should be followed by the author’s last name and year of publication. For the direct citation and indirect citation, the authors should apply the below-mentioned style:

For Direct Citation:

Hasker (1987) has demonstrated that practice improves performance.

For Indirect Citation:

The positive effect of practice upon performance has been demonstrated (Hasker, 1987). If a single author has multiple studies in the same year, the studies will be differentiated by adding (a, and b) with the year of publication. For example, (Hofstede, 1980a, 1980b). In the same way, if there are multiple authors, then ‘&’ (for indirect citation) and ‘and’ for direct citation) will be used before the name of last author and semi-colon (;) will be used for differentiating the multiple studies by the multiple authors. For example, (Gelfand, Erez, & Aycan, 2007; Tsui, Nifadkar, & Ou, 2007). If there are six or more than six authors, then “et al.,” or “et al.” will be used with the first name of the author.

For book, the page number may be added with the year like, Bean and Fix (1992, pp. 44-50) or (Bean & Fix, 1992, pp. 44-50). There is no need of citation pages’ number for any other citation than the citation of book reference.

References for book

Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Chapter of the Book or Book with Editors

Leung, K., & Ang, S. (2009). Culture, organizations, and institutions: An integrative review. In R. S. Bhagat & R. M. Steers (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of culture, organizations, and work (pp. 23-45). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Journal Article

Carpenter, M. A., Li, M., & Jiang, H. (2012). Social network research in organizational contexts: A systematic review of methodological issues and choices. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1328-1361.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206312440119

Conference/Proceedings Paper

Gully, S. M., Payne, S. C., Kiechel, K. L., & Whiteman, J. K. (1999, April). Affective reactions and performance outcomes of error-based training. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Society for Industrial & Organizational Psychology Conference, Atlanta, GA.

Working Paper/Discussion Paper

Gardner, T. M., Moynihan, L. M., Park, H. J., & Wright, P. M. (2001). Beginning to unlock the black box in the HR firm performance relationship: The impact of HR practices on employee attitudes and employee outcomes (CAHRS Working Paper 01-12). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.

Dissertation/Thesis/Unpublished Work

Taras, V. (2008). Work-related acculturation: Change in individual work-related cultural values following immigration (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Online Source

Taras, V. (2008). Catalogue of instruments for measuring culture. Retrieved from

http://vtaras.com/files/Culture Survey Catalogue.pdf