AI Instructional Prescriptiveness and Adaptive Performance: Evaluating the Instructional Agency Paradox Through Cognitive Dependency and Perceived Autonomy

Authors

  • Sajeela Rabbani Iqra University H-9 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Amen Siddiqui Faculty of Business Studies, Arab Open University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Sundus Wasai Khan Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Asma Halim Iqra University H-9 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33152/jmphss-10.3.5

Keywords:

Algorithmic Management, AI Literacy, Cognitive Dependency, Adaptive Performance, Instructional Agency Paradox, Human-AI Collaboration.

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which, AI instructional prescriptiveness (AIIP) impacts knowledge workers' adaptive performance (ADP) through cognitive dependency (CD) and perceived autonomy (PA). Moderating role of AI literacy was also examined. The focus is on the instructional agency paradox where AI driven instruction is counter to the human intelligence that the system is intended to augment. This study contains data from 202 knowledge workers using AI prompted training tool(s) in their work processes. A purposive sample of workers in information technology firms of Pakistan were examined. Survey was conducted and quantitative analyses have done by using SPSS 29 and PLS-SEM was used through Smart PLS4. The study identified that AI instructional prescriptiveness negatively predicts the adaptive performance. The mediating factors perceived autonomy and cognitive dependency partially mediated the relationship between AIIP and ADP. In addition, contrary to the techno-optimists, AI Literacy did not moderate the impact implying that upskilling is insufficient to counter design constraining systems. As algorithmic management becomes a norm in people management, learning and development managers and systems architects need to think beyond prescriptive data and move to supportive frameworks. Organizations have to understand that high friction, prescriptive AI will likely create a digitally skilled but cognitively dependent employee. This research contributes to the expanding body of literature on artificial intelligence by addressing the. autonomy and cognitive dependency pathways that explain performance eroding processes.

References

Agaoglu, F. O., Bas, M., Tarsuslu, S., Ekinci, L. O., & Agaoglu, N. B. (2025). The mediating digital literacy and the moderating role of academic support in the relationship between artificial intelligence usage and creative thinking. BMC Nursing, 24(484). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03128-3

Akram, M. W., Mirza, S., Mahar, S. (2024). Promoting employee green behaviour in the Pakistani education sector: Mediating role of green perceived organizational support in the relationship of green HRM and employee green behaviours. Global Business Review, 24(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509241232195

Azhar, K., Sethi, S., Mustafa, S. N., & Bibi, M. (2025). Bridging the Skills Gap in the Age of AI: Strategies for Upskilling and Reskilling in Higher Education. Dialogue Social Science Review, 3(2), 1-16.

Brouwers, S., & Joung, W. (2024). Predicting Skill Decay: A Practical Application of the Skill Decay Analysis Tool. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.

Buçinca, Z., Malaya, M. B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021). To trust or to think: Cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on AI in AI-assisted decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1–21.

Cetindamar, D., Kitto, K., Wu, M., Zhang, Y., Abedin, B., & Knight, S. (2022). Explicating AI literacy of employees at digital workplaces. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(3), 280–293.

Dao, N. T., Nguyen, T. T., & Cohen, A. (2025). The impact of AI on employee job performance: The role of digital resilience. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 46(2), 112-135.

Dogruel, L., Masur, P., & Joeckel, S. (2022). Development and Validation of an Algorithm Literacy Scale for Internet Users. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(2), 115-133.

Ersanlı, C. Y., Çelik, F., Barjesteh, H., Duran, V., & Manoochehrzadeh, M. (2025). A review of global reskilling and upskilling initiatives in the age of AI. AI and Ethics, 5, 5719-5728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00767-9

Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006

Ghaedipour, F. (2022). The Autonomy Paradox in Platform Work: A Sociomaterial Perspective on the Work of Instagram Content Creators [Doctoral dissertation, McMaster University].

Gong, T. (2025). Algorithmic management and gig workers: engagement, exhaustion and citizenship behavior. Information Technology & People. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2024-0012

Hopper, V. J. (2025). Cognitive offloading and the reshaping of human thought: The subtle influence of Artificial Intelligence. Colloquia, 12, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31207/colloquia.v12i1.185

Jiang, J., Hu, J., & Li, S. (2025). Control or Empowerment: Toward a Research Agenda on the Duality of Algorithmic Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources.

Kešāne, I., & Spuriņa, M. (2025). Theorizing autonomy in the platform economy: A study of food delivery gig workers in Latvia. The Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261251330475

Krijgsheld, M., Tummers, L. G., & Scheepers, F. E. (2024). Job performance in healthcare: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1-18.

Kulal, A. (2025). Cognitive Risks of AI: Literacy, Trust, and Critical Thinking. Journal of Computer Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2025.2582050

Lee, J. H., & Jeon, J. H. (2025). Examining the impact of AI literacy and its antecedents on job performance in the context of South Korea. Asia Pacific Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2025.2487780

Lippert, I. (2025). Algorithmic Management in Different Work Contexts: Implications for Workers and Managers [Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden].

Liu, X., Zhang, L., & Wei, X. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence Literacy: Scale Development and Its Effect on Job Performance. Behavioral Sciences, 15(6), 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060811

Lu, Z., Wang, D., & Yin, M. (2024). Does More Advice Help? The Effects of Second Opinions in AI-Assisted Decision Making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1).

Macnamara, B. N., Berber, I., Çavuşoğlu, M. C., Krupinski, E. A., & Ray, S. (2024). Does using artificial intelligence assistance accelerate skill decay and hinder skill development without performers' awareness? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 9(46).

Meijerink, J., & Bondarouk, T. (2023). The duality of algorithmic management: Toward a research agenda on HRM algorithms, autonomy and value creation. Human Resource Management Review, 33, 100876.

Merritt, S. M., Ako-Adjei, S. P., & Schnyer, C. (2019). Automation-induced complacency potential: Development and validation of a new scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 225.

Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-1448.

Reisdorf, B. C., & Blank, G. (2021). Algorithmic Literacy and Platform Trust. In E. Hargittai (Ed.), Handbook of Digital Inequality (pp. 341-357). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Röttgen, J., Gierlich-Joas, M., & Hess, T. (2025). COMAMA: A Scale for Measuring the Completeness of Algorithmic Management. Proceedings of the 58th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

Schemmer, M., Kuehl, N., Benz, C., Bartos, A., & Satzger, G. (2023). Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanations. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '23), 318-328.

Spurava, G., & Kotilainen, S. (2023). Digital literacy as a pathway to professional development in the algorithm-driven world. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 18(1), 48-59.

SSRN (2024). The Paradox of Augmentation: A Theoretical Model of AI-Induced Skill Atrophy. SSRN Preprint 4974044.

Wang, B., Rau, P. L. P., & Yuan, T. (2022). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324-1337.

Wang, W., Hafeez, M., Jiang, H., Ashraf, M. U., Asif, M., & Akram, M. W. (2022). How do energy prices and climate shocks affect human health? Insights from BRICS. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 32751–32761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24218-8

Wissuchek, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Prescriptive analytics systems revised: a systematic literature review from an information systems perspective. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 23, 279-353.

Zhang, M. M., Cooke, F. L., Ahlstrom, D., & McNeil, N. (2025). The Rise of Algorithmic Management and Implications for Work and Organisations. New Technology, Work and Employment.

Zhu, Y. (2024). The Impact of Algorithmic Control and Algorithmic Management in Online Labor Platforms [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas].

Published

2026-05-28

How to Cite

Rabbani, S., Siddiqui, A., Wasai Khan, S., & Halim, A. (2026). AI Instructional Prescriptiveness and Adaptive Performance: Evaluating the Instructional Agency Paradox Through Cognitive Dependency and Perceived Autonomy. Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(3), 392-402. https://doi.org/10.33152/jmphss-10.3.5