Digital and Traditional Intercultural Communication in Maintaining National Identity: Evidence from the Kazakh Diaspora in Turkey and United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33152/jmphss-10.3.1Keywords:
Digital Age, Identity Maintenance, Intercultural Communication, Kazakh Diaspora, National Identity, Social Media, Transnational Communication.Abstract
Geographical distance between the homeland and the diaspora creates difficulties in preserving and recreating identity, particularly within digital and culturally networked spaces.
This research quantitatively analyzed the relationship between the traditional and digital intercultural communication and the national identity of Kazakh diaspora in terms of age and duration of living in foreign countries.
Digital diaspora theory was used to guide the research, using quantitative cross-sectional survey with snowball sampling on 100 respondents with the aid of a structured questionnaire on the aspects of traditional communication, digital communication, and national identity.
Digital communication has a positive and stronger relationship with national identity (r =0.46, p <0.05) compared to traditional communication with positive but weaker relationship (r = 0.21, p <0.05). Age positively predicted national identity (β = 0.20, p <0.05), while the years spent abroad had an inverted impact (β= -0.35, p <0.05). Turkeys show more dependence on traditional communication (M = 3.40) compared to U.S. respondents who preferred digital communication (M = 4.10). Moreover, there was a significant difference in national identity score of Turkey when compared to the U.S. (t = 3.39, p = 0.001, d = 0.47).
The findings indicate that traditional and digital communication are strongly related to the national identity, and participants in Turkey had stronger traditional relations with a greater identity, whereas those in U.S used more communications digitally.
This research provides an empirical contribution to the research on the relation between communication modes and host-country context in constructing diaspora identity in the digital age.
References
Abikenov, Z., Osserbayev, E., Kulzhanova, A., & Çobanoğlu, Ö. (2023). Values of the kazakh diaspora in Turkey. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Political Science, 83(1). https://doi.org/10.26577/jpcp.2023.v.83.i1.5
Adibaeva, S. T., Saganayeva, A., Kuatova, G., Asylbekova, M., & Ongarbaeva, A. (2025). Kazakh-Polish literary relations: A study of mutual influence and cultural exchange. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(4), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i4.6735
Agnihotri, D. S. (2025). New cultural studies and diasporic criticism: A desperate effort to preserve broken roots. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, X(VIII), 966–973. https://doi.org/10.51584/ijrias.2025.100800084
Akmatbekova, Z., Duishekeeva, A., Baizakova, N., Amatova, G., & Fangxin, H. (2025). The role of media in building social tolerance in Kyrgyzstan’s ethno-cultural diversity. Open Cultural Studies, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2025-0054
Albert-Makyur, S. (2023). Migration and the role of diaspora communities in sustainable development. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 12(12), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2023/v12/i12/DEC23010
Alexandrov, T., Jorayev, G., & Tutumlu (former Rustemova), A. (2018). Ethno-cultural associations in Kazakhstan: The Soviet footprint and resources for civil society. Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22261/cjes.pdxwgc
Arslan, S., Lengyel, D., & Aslan, D. (2023). An “intellectual” migration: Educational backgrounds, purposes, and needs. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12819
Askhat, G., Zhabina, Z., & Khairullayeva, V. (2019). Kazakh diaspora in People’s Republic of China and their social status. Opción, 35, 381–397. http://www.produccioncientifica.luz.edu.ve/index.php/opcion/article/view/24046
Baraldi, S. B., Shoup, D., & Zan, L. (2012). Understanding cultural heritage in Turkey: Institutional context and organisational issues. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(7), 728–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.700283
Bekenova, F., Tulekova, M., Naimanbayev, B., Duisen, S., & Giritlioglu, M. (2025). The role of religious traditions in the development of Turkic culture and their importance for contemporary society. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(3), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3025
Berg, M. (2020). Cultural proximity or cultural distance? Selecting media content among Turkish diasporic audiences in Germany. Diaspora A Journal of Transnational Studies, 20(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.3138/diaspora.20.3.005
Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205
Biwzhanov, A., & Amrebayev, A. (2021). Kazakh cultura as the basic for the nation-building of the republic of Kazakhstan. Adam Alemi, 90(4), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.48010/2021.4/1999-5849.09
Bolat, N., Çakın, Ö., & Sirer, E. (2024). A study on understanding the changing diaspora and virtual communities through digitalization. Quaestio Rossica, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2024.1.868
Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity without groups. In S. May, T. Modood, & J. Squires (Eds.), Ethnicity, nationalism, and minority rights (pp. 50–77). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/ethnicity-nationalism-and-minority-rights/ethnicity-without-groups/1381E1337B12267718A18424EB0F9932
Brubaker, R. (2005). The ‘diaspora’ diaspora. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000289997
Călinescu, A. (2023). The impact of digital technologies on memory and memory studies. Journal of Contemporary Philosophical and Anthropological Studies, 2(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.59652/jcpas.v2i1.161
Chapman, H., & Abraham, A. (2024). Trending now: Implicit factors influence users’ online audiovisual media motivations and engagement. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 44(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366241263842
Chen, H., Xiao, D., Li, J., & Liu, Y. (2025). Study on the distribution characteristics and formation mechanism of traditional village names in Southeast Guizhou. NPJ Heritage Science, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01830-8
Demircioğlu, F. (2024). Digital diplomacy and its impacts on Uzbekistan’s international relations. İmgelem, Özbekistan Özel Sayısı, 171–190. https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1506938
Dhar, A., & Raman, N. M. (2024). The politics of diaspora identity: Negotiating belonging and representation in host and home countries. International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management, 4(3), 256–270.
Ekhaeva, R. M., Arskieva, Z. A., & Vershitsky, A. V. (2024). Formation of national identity as the basis of intercultural communication. SHS Web of Conferences, 195, 05003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419505003
Gulina, O. (2023). The dissolution of the USSR, the newly independent states and their diaspora policies. In O. Solovova & S. Vakser (Eds.), Russian as a transnational language: Resonance, remembrance, renewal (pp. 1–22). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003088004
Hall, S. (1994). Cultural identity and diaspora. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 392–403). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315656496
Heckathorn, D. D. (2011). Snowball versus respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 41, 355–366. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41336927
Insebayeva, S., & Insebayeva, N. (2022). The power of ambiguity: National symbols, nation-building and political legitimacy in Kazakhstan. Europe-Asia Studies, 74(4), 660–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.1912296
Kianpour, M., Triandafyllidou, A., Allen, T., Mazrouei, S., & Shams, M. (2025). Social media narratives, diasporic identity and collective memory: A critical synthesis of the literature. Ethnicities, 26(1), 36-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968251386072
Kozhanbergenova, A., Turuntayeva, A., & Baigondin, R. (2023). Practices of cultural diplomacy development in Kazakhstan and its role in the arena of international reltions. Central Asia’s Affairs, 91(3), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.52536/2788-5909.2023-3.05
Kranz, D. (2020). Towards an emerging distinction between state and people: Return migration programs, diaspora management and agentic migrants. Migration Letters, 17(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i1.770
Landry, C., & Barbosa, P. A. (2016). Culture and the digital city: Its impact and influence. In Culture: Urban future, global report on culture for sustainable urban development (pp. 157–163). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260637
Lebrusán, I., & Gómez, M. V. (2022). The importance of place attachment in the understanding of ageing in place: “the stones know me.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 17052. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417052
Li, Y. (2024). Bridging distances: The impact of ICT on diaspora connectivity and cultural exchange. Communications in Humanities Research, 32(1), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/32/20240135
Magauyanov, D., Zhampeisov, D., & Karazhanova, Z. (2023). Analysis of the state and legal policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan on interaction with the diaspora in the context of sustainable development. Rivista di Studi Sulla Sostenibilità, 2, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.3280/RISS2023-002005
Mogaji, E. (2025). Diaspora theoretical contributors: bridging transnational knowledge and transforming global academia. Globalisation Societies and Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2025.2531977
Moon, D. G. (2023). Critical reflections on culture and critical intercultural communication. In T. K. Nakayama & R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119745426.ch4
Mukhamejanova, D., & Konurbayeva, Z. (2023). Diaspora engagement and return migration for educational purposes in Estonia and Kazakhstan. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 25(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-07-2022-0055
Nassimov, M. (2024). Ethnic identity: Research by Central Asian scientists. Journal of Central Asian Studies, 96(4), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.52536/3006-807X.2024-4.003
Nurbek, K., Kalashnikova, N., & Turan, U. (2025). The Kazakh diaspora in Central Asia: preservation of national identity and institutional influence in the region. Frontiers in Political Science, 7(1583799). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1583799
Okeugo, O., Chinedu, U., Constance, M., Orabueze, O., & Nweke, O. (2020). Cultural identity and language use in African diaspora literature. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(19), 13233–13240.
Priwati, A. R., & Sanitioso, R. B. (2024). Exploring national identity and collective memory across cultures: comparison of Indonesia and France. Frontiers in Political Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1233210
R’boul, H. (2022). Epistemological plurality in intercultural communication knowledge. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2022.2069784
Sadler, G. R., Lee, H.-C., Lim, R. S.-H., & Fullerton, J. (2010). Recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy: Hard-to-reach populations. Nursing & Health Sciences, 12(3), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00541.x
Saiyn, Z. (2023). The process of acculturation of the Kazakh diaspora in the USA. Turkic Studies Journal, 5(4), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2023-4-83-98
Sarwari, A. Q., Adnan, H. M., Rahamad, M. S., & Abdul Wahab, M. N. (2024). The requirements and importance of intercultural communication competence in the 21st Century. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241243119
Shakhanova, G. (2025). Perspectives on Chinese soft power by Kazakh repatriates from China. Asian Studies Review, 49(4), 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2025.2470867
Sigona, N., Gamlen, A., Liberatore, G., & Neveu Kringelbach, H. (Eds.). (2015). Diasporas reimagined: Spaces, practices and belonging. Oxford Diasporas Programme. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/Diasporas_reimagined_Spaces_practices_an.pdf
Tantish, A., & Kaur, S. (2026). The discursive construction of national identity in Palestinian presidential speeches at the United Nations. Asian Englishes, 28(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2025.2560770
Taylor, J., Rubin, J., Giulietti, C., Giacomantonio, C., Tsang, F., Constant, A., Mbaye, L., Nejad, M. N., Kruithof, K., Pardal, M., Hull, A., & Hellgren, T. (2014, December). Mapping diasporas in the European Union and the United States (IZA Research Report No. 64). IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. https://docs.iza.org/report_pdfs/iza_report_64.pdf
Tian, Y. (2025). [Review of the book Digital transnationalism: Chinese-language media in Australia, by W. Sun & H. Yu]. Chinese Journal of Communication, 18(4), 486. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2025.2483090
Ting, H., Memon, M. A., Thurasamy, R., & Cheah, J.-H. (2025). Snowball sampling: A review and guidelines for survey research. Asian Journal of Business Research, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.250186
Tleugazina, S., Shapiyeva, G., Baigabylov, N., & Abetova, Z. (2022). Self-Identification among Kazakh Diaspora in Germany. Migration Letters, 19(5), 677-686. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v19i5.2362
Urpekova, A. (2022). Building the Bonds: A Comparison of Diaspora Engagement Policies in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Turkish Journal of Diaspora Studies, 2(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.52241/tjds.2022.0034
Vainola, R. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Social Media as a Means of Strengthening Family Values Among Young People. Futurity of Social Sciences, 2(4), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.57125/fs.2024.12.20.02
Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927083
Vollmer, B., & Malynovska, O. (2016). Ukrainian migration research before and since 1991. In IMISCOE Research Series (pp. 17–33). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41776-9_2
Weiner, M. D., Puniello, O. T., Siracusa, P. C., & Crowley, J. E. (2017). Recruiting hard-to-reach populations: The utility of Facebook for recruiting qualitative in-depth interviewees. Survey Practice, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2017-0021
Witteborn, S. (2019). Digital diaspora: Social alliances beyond the ethnonational bond. In J. Retis & R. Tsagarousianou (Eds.), The handbook of diasporas, media, and culture (pp. 179–192). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119236771.ch12
Zhang, S.-N., Ruan, W.-Q., & Yang, T.-T. (2021). National identity construction in cultural and creative tourism: The double mediators of implicit cultural memory and explicit cultural learning. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040789
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zhaniya Khassiyetova, Zukhra Ismagambetova , Aliya Karabayeva, Leskhan Askar , Saltanat Aubakirova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

