Cognitive Metaphors as a Means of Persuasive Influence in Texts of Various Genres
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33152/jmphss-10.6.4Keywords:
Artistic discourse, Genre specificity, Media discourse, Political discourse, Pragmatic functionAbstract
The present research is dedicated to the effectiveness of cognitive metaphors as a means of persuasion in political, media, and artistic discourses. Even though numerous studies have already been conducted on metaphorical conceptualization in particular discourse types, comparisons of metaphor structure, function, and audience reactions are rare. In the present study, 30 English texts (published between 2020 and 2024) belonging to the genre of political speech, media, and art (10 texts in each genre) were selected among materials from political databases, English-language magazines and literary journals. 90 people aged 20-35 (M = 26.2) evaluated metaphorical messages using C. Osgood’s semantic differential, questionnaire about the effectiveness of persuasive message and free answers. Content analysis and contextual-semantic analysis, along with descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA were used to identify some patterns. The major source domains in political discourse include: WAR, PATH, MECHANISM, BODY and GAME, in media discourse: ELEMENT, DISEASE, THEATER, ORGANISM, and WEAPON, in artistic discourse: NATURE, LIGHT/DARKNESS, JOURNEY, BODY, and EVERYDAY LIFE. The research revealed the following: political metaphors have a tendency to be normative and rationalizing; media metaphors are critical-evaluative and disturbing; artistic metaphors show better emotional appeal and symbolism. The distinctive feature of the research is a combination of conceptual, pragmatic, and recipient-based analysis of cognitive metaphors. The findings of the research contribute to the development of cognitive metaphor theory by providing evidence concerning the persuasive and emotive effects of metaphor usage.
References
Ahrens, K., Burgers, C., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Evaluating the influence of metaphor in news on foreign-policy support. International Journal of Communication, 16, 24.
Alkhammash, R. (2023). Bibliometric, network, and thematic mapping analyses of metaphor and discourse in COVID-19 publications from 2020 to 2022. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1062943. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062943
Bachryj, M. (2024). The use of conceptual metaphor in the interpretive analysis of political discourse: What can a political scientist learn from a cognitive linguist? Politeja-Pismo Wydziału Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 21(92), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.92.06
Botelho, M. J. (2021). Reframing mirrors, windows, and doors: A critical analysis of the metaphors for multicultural children’s literature. Journal of Children’s Literature, 47(1), 119–126.
Castro Seixas, E. (2021). War metaphors in political communication on COVID-19. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 583680. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fsoc.2020.583680
Chahbane, K., & Zrizi, H. (2023). Language and politics: Framing the use of conceptual metaphors in political discourse. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 6(11), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.11.15
Darisera, S. I., Ririhena, R. L., & Notanubun, Z. (2026). The use of audio-visual media in improving the ability to listen to fairy tales of elementary school students. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 5(2), 1010–1023.
De Saint, A. D., Preux, & Blanco, O. M. (2021). The power of conceptual metaphors in the age of pandemic: The influence of the WAR and SPORT domains on emotions and thoughts. Language & Communication, 81, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. langcom.2021.08.003
Garello, S. (2024). Metaphor as a “matter of thought”: Conceptual metaphor theory. In The enigma of metaphor: Philosophy, pragmatics, cognitive science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56866-4_3
Gibbs Jr, R. W. (2026). When do metaphors come to mind? A cognitive appraisal view of metaphor emergence. Journal of Pragmatics, 257, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2026.02.0
He, S. (2021). Cognitive metaphor theories in translation studies: Toward a dual-model parametric approach. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-0002
Khairulin, O. (2021). Psychological aspects of language game as to mean of influence on human consciousness. Psychological Prospects Journal, 37, 256–269. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2021-37-256-269
Lacković, S., Šporčić, M., & Baralić, M. (2021). War and apocalypse metaphors in media discourse on the pandemic and earthquake in croatia 2020/2021. Medijska istraživanja: znanstveno-stručni časopis za novinarstvo i medije, 27(2), 37–58. https: //doi.org/10.22572/mi.27.2.2
Lapka, O. (2021). Language of persuasion: Analysis of conceptual metaphors in political discourse. The Grove-Working Papers on English Studies, 28, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.v28.6607
Musarrat, M. Q., & Ahmad-ur-Rehman, M. (2026). Sustainable AI-HRM practices and employee well-being: The moderating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 11(3), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.26500/JARSSH-11-2026-0302
Pechko, N. M., & Kharkevych, H. I. (2021). Cognitive aspects of metaphor interpretation in political discourse based on the material of J. Biden’s inaugural speech. Нова філологія, (84), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.26661/2414-1135-2021-84-28
Prymachenko, H., Hryhorova, Y., Kharlamov, P., Kharlamova, O., & Tokarenko, A. (2022). Optimization of cargo movement in the direction of ukraine-european countries on the basis of multimodal routes. Proceedings of 26th International Scientific Conference. Transport Means 2022.
Pstrąg, J. (2026). The metaphors we live by: The persuasive function of metaphorical language in candidates’ for the polish presidency statements. ” Res Rhetorica”, 13(1), 48–73. https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2026.1.3
Septianto, F., Pontes, N., & Tjiptono, F. (2022). The persuasiveness of metaphor in advertising. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 951–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21633
Shevchenko, I. (2024). Multimodal conceptual metaphor in political media discourse. Linguistic Bulletin (Movoznavchyi Visnyk), (36), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.31651/2226-4388-2024-36-132-138
Strohanova, H. (2025). Development of a view on the linguocognitive nature of metaphor. Studia Methodologica, (59), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.32782/2307-1222.2025-59-20
Truba, H., Khrapatyi, S., Harashchuk, K., Shvets, D., & Proskurnia, A. (2024). Psycholinguistic underpinnings of image formation: Suggestion and manipulation in the educational network discourse. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101496.
Voynalovich, L., & Khmara, V. (2025). Cognitive and pragmatic aspects of metaphor use in contemporary english-language journalism. Current Issues in the Humanities, 1(84), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/84-1-27
Wu, Y., Zhao, X., & Liu, M. (2026). Metaphor, topoi, and cognitive heuristics in climate governance: A dual-staged metaphorical argumentation analysis of climate political speech. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, 1147. https: //doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07492-6
Younes, A. S., & Altakhaineh, A. R. M. (2022). Metaphors and metonymies used in memes to depict COVID-19 in Jordanian social media websites. Ampersand, 9, 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100087
Zeng, W. H., Burgers, C., & Ahrens, K. (2021). Framing metaphor use over time:‘Free Economy’metaphors in Hong Kong political discourse (1997-2017). Lingua, 252, 102955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102955
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Karina Bortun, Iryna Soroka, Anton Lytvynenko, Andrii Shuhaiev, Mykhailo Malchenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
