Effectiveness of Low Cost Material to Teach Science at Primary Level
Abstract
The main objective of the study was to develop the interest and conceptual knowledge about science in students. For this purpose, the ‘Low-Cost Material’ concept was taught to the students using different instructional aids. The study was quantitative in nature. Experimental research design was used to check the effectiveness of low-cost material to teach science at the primary level, which were measured through pre and post-test. An action research was conducted in a public sector high school in Rawalpindi. Students of 4th grade were selected to conduct the study. Intervention was carried for one whole week. Pre-test and post-test were taken to collect data, and the collected data was analyzed using mean and t-test. The study found a significant difference between teaching of science through use of “low-cost material” and without using it. The students, when taught science by using “low-cost material, “performed significantly high on the post-test. It was concluded that using low-cost material to teach science positively affected students’ learning. The study will act as a model and guideline for science teachers at primary level to make their teaching more effective by using “low-cost material” as AV aids during science lessons. This will contribute to better science teaching in schools with low or no resources for science teaching.
References
Siva K. R. (2014). Impact of low cost teaching aids in teaching science. Innovative Thoughts International Research Journal, 2(3), 31-36.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Farid, S., Kanwal, W., Ameer, S. & Karim, T. (2021). The influence of prompt teacher feedback in affecting student achievement: Insights from students’ perspective at secondary level. Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(6), 50-59.
https://doi.org/10.33152/jmphss-5.6.6.
Ford, T., Hayes, R., Byford, S., Edwards, V., Fletcher, M., Logan, S., ... & Ukoumunne, O. C. (2019). The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the incredible years® teacher classroom management programme in primary school children: Results of the STARS cluster randomised controlled trial. Psychological Medicine, 49(5), 828-842.
Hope, G. (2004). Teaching design and technology 3-11: The essential guide for teachers. London, UK: A&C Black.
Khitab, U., Zaman, A., Ghaffar, A., & Jan, Q. (2015). Impact of low cost teaching material on students' attitude towards science at secondary level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Memon, G. R. (2007). Education in Pakistan: The key issues, problems and the new challenges. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 3(1), 47-55.
Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D.J. (2014). Conceptualizing the enacted curriculum in mathematics education. In D. R. Thomspson & Z. Usiskin (Eds.), Enacted mathematics curriculum. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Sun, C. T., & Vaidya, R. S. (1996). Prediction of composite properties from a representative volume element. Composites Science and Technology, 56(2), 171-179.
Simo, P., Fernandez, V., Algaba, I., Salan, N., Enache, M., Albareda-Sambola, M., ... & Rajadell, M. (2010). Video stream and teaching channels: Quantitative analysis of the use of low-cost educational videos on the web. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2937-2941.
Yitbarek, S. (2012). Low-cost apparatus from locally available materials for teaching-learning science. African Journal of Chemical Education, 2(1), 32-47.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.